5 free sample questions for the California Private Investigator license examination
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0c47T22Wbk
Retired cops: How to pass the California Private Investigator license exam
Retired cops: How to pass the California Private Investigator license exam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSxmLRGgfX4&feature=relmfu
http://www.thePIgroup.com/test_preparation.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSxmLRGgfX4&feature=relmfu
http://www.thePIgroup.com/test_preparation.htm
Need to pass the California Private Investigator license test? Help on YouTube!
Need to pass the California Private Investigator license test? Help on YouTube!
There are 3 simple videos from http://www.thePIgroup.com/test_preparation.htm
http://youtu.be/hPgddVgE794
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU-Mwp9-VYI&feature=plcp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlJkBZr-xjE&feature=plcp
Or call 818-883-6969 for how to pass the test today.
There are 3 simple videos from http://www.thePIgroup.com/test_preparation.htm
http://youtu.be/hPgddVgE794
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU-Mwp9-VYI&feature=plcp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlJkBZr-xjE&feature=plcp
Or call 818-883-6969 for how to pass the test today.
Pass the CA PPO license test and add to your business!
A California Private Patrol Operator license test is the main block between a PI being able to legally offer bodyguard & protection services and committing a misdemeanor by doing it without a PPO license.
Guaranteed PASS study material for the PPO license test is available from http://www.thePIgroup.com/ppo.html by overnight delivery, or you can come in to pick up the six-pound practice-questions-and-more preparation package.
Here's why most persons fail the PPO license test: being unable to answer the business questions. Call 818-883-6969 and ask for four sample PPO license questions!
Guaranteed PASS study material for the PPO license test is available from http://www.thePIgroup.com/ppo.html by overnight delivery, or you can come in to pick up the six-pound practice-questions-and-more preparation package.
Here's why most persons fail the PPO license test: being unable to answer the business questions. Call 818-883-6969 and ask for four sample PPO license questions!
Reid Tip-- To Lie or Not to Lie: The Use of Deception During An Interrogation
To Lie or Not to Lie: The Use of Deception During An Interrogation
If the agents involved in the recent Colombia incident are interrogated, should the investigators tell them they have evidence that they don't really have? It depends on a number of considerations.
Earlier this year a case was reported in which a detective doctored a crime lab report to use as a prop during an interrogation. While the suspect did not confess, the detective's tactics spurred legal questions regarding the use of deception during an interrogation. The legal twist was that even though the report used as an interrogation prop was manufactured by the investigator, it was based on factual verbal information provided by the crime lab. In other words, the manufactured evidence contained truthful information that incriminated the suspect but the report was not a bona fide report from the crime lab.
Legal Considerations
The legal test for deceptive practices during an interrogation has remain unchanged for more than 40 years. The use of deception during an interrogation must be considered within the totality of circumstances when deciding the admissibility of a confession. Deception that shocks the conscience of the court or community will generally result in a suppressed confession. An example of deception that "shocks the conscience" is lying to the suspect about the possible consequences he faces, e.g., telling a homicide suspect that the legislature just dropped first degree murder to a misdemeanor. Similarly, an investigator who elicits a confession after falsely telling the suspect that he is his court appointed public defender has "shocked the conscience".
(thePIgroup is a long-time member of the Reid Group of Preferred Associations; discounts available for Reid seminars and products. www,reid.com )
If the agents involved in the recent Colombia incident are interrogated, should the investigators tell them they have evidence that they don't really have? It depends on a number of considerations.
Earlier this year a case was reported in which a detective doctored a crime lab report to use as a prop during an interrogation. While the suspect did not confess, the detective's tactics spurred legal questions regarding the use of deception during an interrogation. The legal twist was that even though the report used as an interrogation prop was manufactured by the investigator, it was based on factual verbal information provided by the crime lab. In other words, the manufactured evidence contained truthful information that incriminated the suspect but the report was not a bona fide report from the crime lab.
Legal Considerations
The legal test for deceptive practices during an interrogation has remain unchanged for more than 40 years. The use of deception during an interrogation must be considered within the totality of circumstances when deciding the admissibility of a confession. Deception that shocks the conscience of the court or community will generally result in a suppressed confession. An example of deception that "shocks the conscience" is lying to the suspect about the possible consequences he faces, e.g., telling a homicide suspect that the legislature just dropped first degree murder to a misdemeanor. Similarly, an investigator who elicits a confession after falsely telling the suspect that he is his court appointed public defender has "shocked the conscience".
(thePIgroup is a long-time member of the Reid Group of Preferred Associations; discounts available for Reid seminars and products. www,reid.com )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
